Rejection is division of a writer's existence. You must brick beside it. Analyse it and learn from it.
The realness is that you may never cognize why your piece has been rejected. Students have asked me why editors or editorial assistants don't snap any evaluation once the nonfiction is returned.
Imagine how overmuch sweat would be generated if a work prescriptive 200 or 300 articles a month! It is a freelance writer's job to get the nonfiction as exact as reasonable.
If your work is rejected, the skilled worker is not rejecting you, but what you have textual at the time. The refusal could be for any numeral of reasons, for example:
- The skilled worker has but purchased thing on the said subject matter recently
- The article didn't precisely fit the editor's needs, at that time
- The undivided assemblage was not offered and the trained worker didn't have accession to any descriptions that fitted the article, and of course, the of import sense for rejection
- The nonfictional prose wasn't best decent and fully missed the publication's requirements.
An skilled worker may besides renounce articles because of the intensity normative. He/She sifts done the submissions and puts departure from the subject ten possible articles from which with the sole purpose four will be agreed. Your nonfiction may be one of the ten rejected contempt it self dead crafted for that work.
There is thing such worse than acceptance a human activity skip - ne'er having written thing.